Emergent multisystemic Enterococcus infection threatens endangered Christmas Island reptile populations

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 20;12(7):e0181240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181240. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Multisystemic infections with a morphologically unusual bacterium were first observed in captive critically endangered Lister's geckos (Lepidodactylus listeri) on Christmas Island in October 2014. Since then the infection was identified in another captive critically endangered lizard species, the blue-tailed skink (Cryptoblepharus egeriae) and two species of invasive geckos; the four clawed gecko (Gehyra mutilata) and Asian house gecko (Hemidactylus frenatus), in a wide geographic range across the east side of the island. The Gram and periodic acid-Schiff positive cocci to diplococci have a propensity to form chains surrounded by a matrix, which ultrastructurally appears to be formed by fibrillar capsular projections. The bacterium was associated with severe and extensive replacement of tissues, but minimal host inflammatory response. Attempts to grow the organism in culture and in embryonated eggs were unsuccessful. Molecular characterisation of the organism placed it as a novel member of the genus Enterococcus. Disease Risk Analyses including this organism should now be factored into conservation management actions and island biosecurity.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Australia
  • Communicable Diseases, Emerging / pathology
  • Communicable Diseases, Emerging / veterinary
  • Endangered Species
  • Enterococcus / isolation & purification*
  • Genome, Bacterial
  • Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections / epidemiology
  • Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections / pathology
  • Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections / veterinary*
  • Phylogeny
  • Reptiles / microbiology*
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA

Grants and funding

Taronga Conservation Society Australia provided in-kind support of the project through the time and resources of Jane Hall and Karrie Rose. National Significant Disease Investigation Scheme contributed $2000 and Wildlife Health Australia contributed $1500 toward the investigation. Neither of these two funders had any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.