Is it possible to claim or refute sputum eosinophils ≥ 3% in asthmatics with sufficient accuracy using biomarkers?

Respir Res. 2017 Jul 3;18(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12931-017-0615-9.

Abstract

The concept of asthma inflammatory phenotypes has proved to be important in predicting response to inhaled corticosteroids. Induced sputum, which has been pivotal in the development of the concept of inflammatory phenotypes, is however not widely available. Several studies have proposed to use surrogate exhaled or blood biomarkers, like fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), blood eosinophils and total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE). However, taken alone, each of these biomarkers has moderate accuracy to identify sputum eosinophilia. Here, we propose a new approach based on the likelihood ratio to study which thresholds of these biomarkers, taken alone or in combination, were able to rule in or rule out sputum eosinophils ≥3%. We showed in a large population of 869 asthmatics that combining FENO, blood eosinophils and total serum IgE could accurately predict sputum eosinophils ≥ or <3% in 58% of our population.

Keywords: Asthma; Biomarkers; Blood; Eosinophils; Immunoglobulin E; Nitric oxide; Phenotype; Sputum.

Publication types

  • Letter
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Asthma / blood
  • Asthma / diagnosis*
  • Asthma / metabolism*
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Biomarkers / metabolism
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Eosinophils / metabolism*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sputum / metabolism*

Substances

  • Biomarkers