Individual perception of bees: Between perceived danger and willingness to protect

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0180168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180168. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The current loss of biodiversity has found its way into the media. Especially the loss of bees as pollinators has recently received much attention aiming to increase public awareness about the consequence of pollinator loss and strategies for protection. However, pollinating insects like bees often prompt considerable anxiety. Negative emotions such as fear and disgust often lead to lack of support for conservation and appropriate initiatives for protection. Our study monitored perceptions of bees in the contexts of conservation and danger bees possibly represent by applying a semantic differential using contrasting adjectives under the heading "I think bees are…". Additionally, open questions were applied to examine individual perceptions of danger and conservation of bees. Respondents were students from primary school, secondary school and university. We compared these novices (n = 499) to experts (beekeepers, n = 153). An exploratory factor analysis of the semantic differential responses yielded three major oblique factors: Interest, Danger and Conservation & Usefulness. The inter-correlations of these factors were significant. Although all subgroups showed an overall high willingness to protect bees, the perception of danger scored medium. The individual experience of bee stings was the most prevalent reason for expressing fear. Educational programs focusing on pollinator conservation may reduce the perceived danger through removing misinformation, and supporting interest in the species. Based on the overall positive attitude toward bees, we suggest introducing bees (e.g., Apis mellifera) as a flagship species for pollinator conservation.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bees
  • Biodiversity
  • Fear*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mass Media
  • Perception*
  • Pollination / physiology*

Grants and funding

Financial support was granted by the GreeNET Project funded by European Union LLP Grant Agreement No. 527891 (http://greenet.ea.gr/) and the University of Bayreuth. Publishing fees were funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the University of Bayreuth in the funding program Open Access Publishing. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.