Phenological changes in bamboo carbohydrates explain the preference for culm over leaves by giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) during spring

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 14;12(6):e0177582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177582. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Seasonal changes in the foodscape force herbivores to select different plant species or plant parts to meet nutritional requirements. We examined whether the search for calorie-rich carbohydrates explained giant panda's selection for bamboo culm over leaves during spring. Leaves and culms were collected from four Phyllostachys bamboos (P. aurea, P. aureosulcata, P. glauca, and P. nuda) once per month over 18-27 months. Monthly changes in annual plant part nutrients were examined, and compared to seasonal foraging behaviors of captive giant pandas. Although total fiber was greater (p<0.0001) in culm (85.6 ± 0.5%) than leaves (55.3 ± 0.4%) throughout the year, culm fiber was at its lowest in spring (79-85%) when culm selection by giant pandas exceeded 70% of their overall diet. Culm starch also was greatest (p = 0.044) during spring (5.5 ± 1.1%) and 2.5-fold the percentage of starch in leaves (2.2 ± 0.6%). The free sugars in spring culm consisted of a high proportion of glucose (35%) and fructose (47%), whereas sucrose made up 42% of the total free sugar content of spring leaves. Bound sugars in culm consisted of 60% glucose and 38% xylose likely representative of hemicellulose. The concentrations of bound sugars (hemicelluloses) in spring culms (543.7 ± 13.0 mg/g) was greater (p<0.001) than in leaves (373.0 ± 14.8 mg/g). These data help explain a long-standing question in giant panda foraging ecology: why consume the plant part with the lowest protein and fat during the energetically intensive spring breeding season? Giant pandas likely prefer spring culm that contains abundant mono- and polysaccharides made more bioavailable as a result of reduced fiber content. These data suggest that phenological changes in bamboo plant part nutrition drive foraging decisions by giant pandas.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animal Feed / analysis
  • Animals
  • Animals, Zoo
  • Phenols / analysis*
  • Plant Leaves / chemistry
  • Plant Stems / chemistry
  • Poaceae / chemistry*
  • Seasons
  • Ursidae / physiology*

Substances

  • Phenols

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Morris Animal Foundation (grant #D08ZO-027) and the Memphis Zoo for research intended to better understand and improve giant panda gastrointestinal health. Laboratory analyses was funded, in part, by Dr. Fahey’s lab at the Department of Animal Sciences at the University of Illinois, Urbana, IL. Funding was also provided by the USDA-ARS Biophotonics Initiative at Mississippi State University, the Mississippi Agriculture and Forestry Experiment Station, and the U.S. Forest Service International Programs Office, Asia-Pacific section (07-DG-11132762236). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.