In vitro induction of NETosis: Comprehensive live imaging comparison and systematic review

PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176472. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Background: Multiple inducers of in vitro Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET) formation (NETosis) have been described. Since there is much variation in study design and results, our aim was to create a systematic review of NETosis inducers and perform a standardized in vitro study of NETosis inducers important in (cardiac) wound healing.

Methods: In vitro NETosis was studied by incubating neutrophils with PMA, living and dead bacteria (S. aureus and E. coli), LPS, (activated) platelets (supernatant), glucose and calcium ionophore Ionomycin using 3-hour periods of time-lapse confocal imaging.

Results: PMA is a consistent and potent inducer of NETosis. Ionomycin also consistently resulted in extrusion of DNA, albeit with a process that differs from the NETosis process induced by PMA. In our standardized experiments, living bacteria were also potent inducers of NETosis, but dead bacteria, LPS, (activated) platelets (supernatant) and glucose did not induce NETosis.

Conclusion: Our systematic review confirms that there is much variation in study design and results of NETosis induction. Our experimental results confirm that under standardized conditions, PMA, living bacteria and Ionomycin all strongly induce NETosis, but real-time confocal imaging reveal different courses of events.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Escherichia coli / physiology
  • Extracellular Traps*
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Humans
  • In Vitro Techniques
  • Myocardium / pathology
  • Staphylococcus aureus / physiology
  • Wound Healing

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Trombosestichting: TSN2013-2 (https://www.trombosestichting.nl/, received by MPMdM). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.