Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs. open resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177193. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Background: This meta-analysis compared laparoscopic surgery (LAP) and open resection (OPEN) for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) with regard to feasibility and safety.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published before March 2016 comparing the LAP and OPEN procedures for GISTs. RevMan 5.1 software was used for the meta-analysis.

Results: In total, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The mean tumor sizes in the OPEN and LAP groups were 4.54 and 5.67 cm. Compared with the OPEN patients, the LAP patients experienced shorter surgical times (P = 0.05), less blood loss (P<0.01), earlier time to flatus (P<0.01) and an oral diet (P<0.01), and shorter hospital stays (P<0.01). The LAP patients also exhibited a decrease in overall complications (P<0.01). In addition, regarding the subgroup of larger GISTs (>5 cm), the present study did not report significant differences in operation time (P = 0.93), postoperative complications (P = 0.30), or recurrence rate (P = 0.61) between the two groups, though LAP was associated with favorable results regarding blood loss (P = 0.03) and hospital stay (P<0.01).

Conclusions: Compared with the OPEN procedure, the LAP procedure is associated with preferable short-term postoperative outcomes and does not compromise long-term oncological outcomes. For gastric GISTs >5 cm, no significant difference was detected between LAP and OPEN if patient selection and intraoperative decisions were carefully considered.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis

MeSH terms

  • Feasibility Studies
  • Gastrectomy / methods*
  • Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / methods*
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.