Objective: To compare the refractive outcomes of a 3-piece acrylic intraocular lens (IOL) with its 1-piece counterpart after phacoemulsification with in-the-bag implantation.
Design: Retrospective chart review.
Participants: One-hundred twenty-six eyes of 95 patients were analyzed in the study, including 60 eyes of 43 patients receiving a 3-piece IOL and 66 eyes of 52 patients receiving a 1-piece IOL.
Methods: Randomized chart review of all patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification with in-the-bag IOL implantation with either a 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL (Tecnis ZA9003) or a 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL (Tecnis ZCB00) between 2006 and 2014 in a tertiary ophthalmology care centre in Mississauga, Ontario. Preoperative visual acuity and refraction, anterior chamber depth, axial length, IOL design and power, predicted refraction, postoperative visual acuity, and refraction were recorded.
Results: Mean absolute error was 0.40 ± 0.27 in the ZA9003 group and 0.39 ± 0.35 in the ZCB00 group, with no statistically significant difference between the 2 IOLs (p = 0.86). Mean arithmetic error was 0.11 ± 0.47 D in the ZA9003 group and 0.01 ± 0.47 D in the ZCB00 group (p = 0.019). In the ZA9003 group, 23 (38%), 42 (70%), and 52 (87%) of 60 eyes were within 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 D, respectively, of predicted postoperative refraction. In the ZCB00 group, 32 (48%), 46 (70%), and 56 (85%) of 66 eyes were within 0.25, 0.50, and 0.75 D, respectively, of predicted postoperative refraction (p = 0.2836, p = 1.00, p = 0.8044).
Conclusions: The ZA9003 and the ZCB00 have similar mean absolute error and thus appear to have similar refractive predictability.
Copyright © 2017 Canadian Ophthalmological Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.