Comparison of methodologies to assess muscle co-contraction during gait

J Biomech. 2017 May 24:57:141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Apr 9.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare co-contraction index (CCI) computed from muscle moments to different co-activation indexes (Co-Act) derived from EMG data at the ankle and the knee joint during gait. An EMG-driven model was used to estimate muscle moments during over-ground walking gait at a self-selected velocity from twelve healthy subjects. The CCI calculated from muscle moments was compared with three Co-Acts estimated from the normalized EMG data. The co-activation methods produced lower values than the CCI during the first double-support and the swing phase at the ankle joint and during the stance phase at the knee joint. The co-activation methods trend is to underestimate the simultaneous action of agonist and antagonist contraction. Because the EMG-driven model included the muscle mechanical properties (e.g. force-length-velocity relationship) and muscle moment-arm, the co-contraction based on major agonist and antagonist muscle moment may provide a more confident description of muscle action compared to co-activation indexes.

Keywords: Co-contraction; EMG activity; EMG-driven modeling; Gait; Muscle moment.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Ankle Joint / physiology
  • Electromyography / methods
  • Female
  • Gait / physiology*
  • Humans
  • Knee Joint / physiology*
  • Male
  • Models, Biological*
  • Muscle Contraction / physiology
  • Muscle, Skeletal / physiology*
  • Young Adult