Changing Referral Patterns to Urogynecology

Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan-Feb;24(1):48-50. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000416.

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to identify sources of and changes in referral patterns for pelvic floor disorders.

Methods: All new patient visits to urogynecology at our institution between January 2010 and December 2015 were identified. Patient demographics, referral source, insurance type, and visit diagnoses using ICD-9 codes were abstracted. ICD-9 codes were grouped into 18 urogynecologic diagnoses. Data were analyzed using SPSS (Version 20; Chicago, IL).

Results: Five thousand seven hundred ninety-nine new patient visits were included in the analysis. The mean age was 54 ± 17 years and 59% were Caucasian. Forty-four percent were referred by obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYNs), 32% by primary care providers (PCPs), 14% by self-referral, and 9% by other specialties. New patient visits increased overall by 280% over 6 years; self- and PCP referrals increased by 480% and 320%, respectively. In comparison, OB/GYN referrals increased by only 229%. Patients diagnosed with prolapse and stress incontinence were more likely to be referred by an OB/GYN (P < 0.001), whereas PCPs were more likely to refer for urinary tract infections (P < 0.005) and urgency urinary incontinence (P < 0.001) than OB/GYNs.

Conclusions: Demand for pelvic floor specialists is growing quickly, with PCP and self-referrals outpacing referrals from obstetrician-gynecologists to tertiary care urogynecology practices.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Gynecology*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Obstetrics*
  • Pelvic Floor Disorders / epidemiology*
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Referral and Consultation / statistics & numerical data*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tertiary Care Centers / statistics & numerical data