Efficacy and Safety of Bendamustine and Ibrutinib in Previously Untreated Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Indirect Comparison

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2017 May;17(5):268-273. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 7.

Abstract

Bendamustine and ibrutinib are commonly used in the treatment of patients suffering from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). In this study we compare efficacy and safety bendamustine versus ibrutinib therapy in previously untreated patients with CLL. Because there are no head-to-head comparisons between bendamustine and ibrutinib, we performed indirect comparison using Bucher method. A systematic literature review was performed and 2 studies published before June 2016 were taken into analysis. Treatment with ibrutinib significantly improves PFS determined by investigator (HR of 0.3; P = .01) and OS (HR of 0.21; P < .001. Our study indicates that ibrutinib therapy improves PFS, OS and is superior in terms of safety comparing with bendamustine therapy in CLL patients.

Keywords: Bendamustine; CLL; First line of treatment; Ibrutinib; Indirect comparison.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adenine / analogs & derivatives
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Bendamustine Hydrochloride / therapeutic use*
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Humans
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell / drug therapy*
  • Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell / mortality
  • Piperidines
  • Pyrazoles / therapeutic use*
  • Pyrimidines / therapeutic use*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Piperidines
  • Pyrazoles
  • Pyrimidines
  • ibrutinib
  • Bendamustine Hydrochloride
  • Adenine