The central mudminnow (Umbra limi) and yellow perch (Perca flavescens) are two species of fishes that commonly co-occur in small bog lakes in the Great Lakes region of North America. Both species are dietary generalists with a high degree of dietary overlap, and perch populations have been shown to have a strong negative effect on mudminnow populations. I compared the foraging rates of the two species in a series of laboratory experiments in which four foraging sites were simulated (open bottom substrate, water column, submerged aquatic macrophytes, and water surface). Fish were observed as they foraged singly, in monospecific pairs, and in mixed species pairs to evaluate the effects of intra- and interspecific competition on foraging success and the potential for resource partitioning based on foraging site. Single species trials showed that each species had similar foraging rates at each of the four sites. Across all sites combined, interspecific competition had a greater negative effect on the foraging success of mudminnows than did intraspecific competition. Conversely, intraspecific competition had a greater negative effect on the foraging success of perch than did interspecific competition. In mixed species trials perch took more food items from each of the four foraging sites than did mudminnows and caused shifts in site-use patterns of mudminnows. Differences in the foraging success of the two species reflected the superior ability of perch to discover the presence of food and to search rapidly for additional items, but were unrelated to handling times. These differences were linked to the species' foraging modes. The competitive superiority of perch, demonstrated in these experiments, could contribute to the negative impact of perch on mudminnow populations under natural conditions.