The potential distribution of cassava mealybug (Phenacoccus manihoti), a threat to food security for the poor

PLoS One. 2017 Mar 15;12(3):e0173265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173265. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

The cassava mealybug is a clear and present threat to the food security and livelihoods of some of the world's most impoverished citizens. Niche models, such as CLIMEX, are useful tools to indicate where and when such threats may extend, and can assist with planning for biosecurity and the management of pest invasions. They can also contribute to bioeconomic analyses that underpin the allocation of resources to alleviate poverty. Because species can invade and establish in areas with climates that are different from those that are found in their native range, it is essential to define robust range-limiting mechanisms in niche models. To avoid spurious results when applied to novel climates, it is necessary to employ cross-validation techniques spanning different knowledge domains (e.g., distribution data, experimental results, phenological observations). We build upon and update a CLIMEX niche model by Parsa et al. (PloS ONE 7: e47675), correcting inconsistent parameters and re-fitting it based on a careful examination of geographical distribution data and relevant literature. Further, we consider the role of irrigation, the known distribution of cassava production and a targeted review of satellite imagery to refine, validate and interpret our model and results. In so doing, we bring new insights into the potential spread of this invasive insect, enabling us to identify potential bio-security threats and biological control opportunities. The fit of the revised model is improved, particularly in relation to the wet and dry limits to establishment, and the parameter values are biologically plausible and accord with published scientific literature.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Food Supply*
  • Hemiptera / physiology*

Grants and funding

This work was partly supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation under the HarvestCHoice project “HarvestChoice: Supporting Strategic Investment Choices in Agricultural Technology Development and Adoption”, grant number 2010X446. UMN to support TY. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. DK and NO received no specific funding for this work.