Treosulfan-Based Conditioning Regimen in Sibling and Alternative Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Children with Sickle Cell Disease

Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 15;9(1):e2017014. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2017.014. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Lack of suitable donors and regimen related toxicity are major barriers for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). The aim of the study is the assessment of efficacy and toxicity of Treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for SCD also when alternative donors such as mismatched unrelated donor and haploidentical donor are employed.

Methods: We report our single-center experience: 11 patients with SCD received HSCT with a Treosulfan/Thiotepa/Fludarabine/Anti-thymoglobulin conditioning regimen between 2010 and 2015. The donor was a matched sibling donor (n= 7), a haploidentical parent (n= 2), a matched unrelated donor (n= 1) or a mismatched unrelated donor (n=1). The haploidentical and mismatched unrelated donor grafts were manipulated by removing TCRαβ and CD19 positive cells.

Results: All patients survived the procedure and achieved stable engraftment. Stable mixed chimerism was observed in 5/11 patients. Grade III-IV regimen related toxicity was limited to mucositis and no grade III-IV graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) occurred. No SCD manifestation was observed post transplant and cerebral vasculopathy improved in 3/5 evaluable patients. Organ function evaluation showed no pulmonary, cardiac or renal toxicity but gonadal failure occurred in 1/4 evaluable patients.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that Treosulfan is associated with low toxicity and may be employed also for unrelated and haploidentical donor HSCT.

Keywords: Haploidentical; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Sickle cell disease; T-cell depletion; Treosulfan.