Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the prevention of febrile neutropenia: review of cost-effectiveness models

Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017 Feb;17(1):39-52. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2017.1276829. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

Abstract

We reviewed the evolution of the methods used in cost-effectiveness analyses of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) in the primary and secondary prevention of febrile neutropenia (FN) in patients receiving myelosuppressive cancer chemotherapy. Areas covered: FN is a side effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and costs. The risk of FN may depend on the drugs used within a chemotherapy regimen, and an FN event may cause chemotherapy dose reductions or delays in subsequent cycles. Expert commentary: More recent pharmacoeconomic models have reflected these clinical observations by modeling sequential chemotherapy regimens to account for FN risk on a per-cycle basis, and by accounting for chemotherapy dose reductions and consequent survival losses.

Keywords: Febrile neutropenia; cost-effectiveness; economic evaluation; growth-colony stimulating factors; review.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Febrile Neutropenia / chemically induced
  • Febrile Neutropenia / economics
  • Febrile Neutropenia / prevention & control*
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / economics
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor / therapeutic use*
  • Humans
  • Models, Economic*
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Primary Prevention / economics
  • Primary Prevention / methods
  • Secondary Prevention / economics
  • Secondary Prevention / methods

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor