Local extension staging of sinonasal tumours: retrospective comparison between CT/MRI assessment and pathological findings

Clin Otolaryngol. 2017 Oct;42(5):988-993. doi: 10.1111/coa.12827. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the reliability of clinical staging with CT and MRI in sinonasal cancers.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent surgery for a sinonasal cancer. The 7th edition of the TNM classification was used to establish tumour staging. Standardised preoperative CT/MRI staging was compared with the pathological staging based on specimens obtained during surgery from each subsite within and around the tumour.

Results: We analysed data from 68 patients between January 2010 and December 2014. A comparison of cT and pT stages was established for 49 naso-ethmoidal and 16 maxillary tumours. Clinical staging for naso-ethmoidal cT1 and maxillary cT2 was consistent with pathological results. Clinical staging for naso-ethmoidal cT2, cT3 and cT4b was overstated in comparison with pT findings. The positive predictive value of imaging was <65% for the lamina papyracea, the cribriform plate, the dura, and the frontal and sphenoid sinuses. Sensitivity was over 75% for each anatomical site except for the cribriform plate (73.3%) and the sphenoid sinus (57.2%).

Conclusion: Systematic pathologic analysis of the anatomical areas around the sinonasal cancer has to be applied in further studies to improve our therapeutic management. CT/MRI mapping cannot replace accurate assessment of tumour extension during surgery.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms / surgery
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
  • Young Adult