Factors Associated With Surgical Outcomes in Congenital Ptosis: A 10-Year Study of 319 Cases

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the 10-year results of surgery for congenital ptosis and identify factors associated with excellent outcomes and recurrence.

Design: Retrospective, interventional case series.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 319 patients who underwent surgical correction at a tertiary medical center for congenital ptosis. The main outcome measures were postoperative surgical outcomes and recurrence rates. Excellent lid height was assessed as a marginal reflex distance (MRD) greater than 3 mm. Recurrence was defined as a lid height less than 50% of the initial postoperative lid height.

Results: The overall surgical success rate was 97.2%. On multivariate analysis, 3 factors were significantly associated with a greater probability of achieving excellent lid height: treatment using levator muscle resection (LMR) (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.76; P = .04), better preoperative MRD (adjusted OR, 2.21; P < .001), and absence of Marcus Gunn (jaw-winking) syndrome (adjusted OR, 0.12; P = .01). For recurrence, 7 significant risk factors were identified: children less than 1 year old (adjusted OR, 4.92; P = .02), poorer preoperative MRD (adjusted OR, 0.64; P = .04), poorer postoperative MRD (adjusted OR, 0.32; P < .001), treatment with frontalis suspension (FS) (adjusted OR, 5.86; P < .001), wound infection (adjusted OR, 9.45; P = .02), postoperative entropion (adjusted OR, 11.25; P = .003), and conjunctival prolapse (adjusted OR, 7.10; P = .03). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 1-, 5-, and 10-year recurrence-free rates were 97.3% ± 1.2%, 80.5% ± 4.4%, and 76.7% ± 5.6%, respectively, for the LMR group and 90.9% ± 3.1%, 42.9% ± 8.1%, and 20.8% ± 10.1%, respectively, for the FS group (P < .001, log-rank test).

Conclusions: Surgical treatment of congenital ptosis had a high success rate. Identifying the risk factors and taking appropriate measures may result in better surgical outcomes and less recurrence. Our retrospective study showed that the likelihood of achieving excellent outcomes with lower recurrence rates was higher with LMR than with FS. However, a prospective randomized study is necessary to clarify their efficacy.