Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy following transrectal compared to transperineal prostate biopsy: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes

Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2017 Feb;69(1):85-92. doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.16.02759-4. Epub 2016 Sep 29.

Abstract

Background: To assess if transperineal prostate (TP) biopsy affects th e outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP), with particular reference to perioperative complications, oncological results and functional outcomes in the early postoperative setting.

Methods: We identified 61 men who had undergone RALP after TP biopsies, from June 2012 to June 2014 and a control group of 120 men who had undergone RALP after conventional TRUS biopsy in the same period. Data was compared from the pre-operative biopsy, peri- and postoperative period, procedural outcomes including histological, oncological and functional outcomes between the groups.

Results: The groups had comparable demographics, with matched median ages and PSA levels. There was a higher incidence of Gleason 6 disease detected in the TRUS group (P=0.01). Mean operative time (146 minutes TRUS vs. 158 minutes TP, P=0.133), blood loss (250 mL TRUS vs. 288 mL TP, P=0.462) and intraoperative complications were not significantly different between groups. Median length of stay (1 day) and median catheter duration (7 days) were identical in both cohorts. PSA failure rate at 6 months was similar (11.7% TRUS vs. 9.8% TP, P=0.904). There were no differences in functional outcomes (potency or continence) between groups at 6 month s follow-up.

Conclusions: RALP is safe after TP biopsy with no adverse impact on oncological or short-term functional outcomes.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Biopsy / methods
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prostatectomy / methods*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Recovery of Function
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures*
  • Treatment Outcome