Background: p16 INK4A (p16) functions as a tumor suppressor gene in various malignancies. Aberrant p16 methylation has been proposed to be essential in ovarian carcinogenesis. However, it is unclear whether p16 can be used as a diagnostic marker owing to the small sample sizes in previous studies.
Methods: To determine whether p16 promoter methylation is associated with epithelial ovarian cancer and can thus be used as a diagnostic marker, we performed a meta-analysis of published studies. The following databases were searched using a systematic search method: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure. We used a random-effects model to analyze the relative risk (RR); we also evaluated between-study heterogeneity, subgroup heterogeneity, and publication bias.
Results: Our meta-analysis included eight eligible studies, with 428 ovarian cancers and 278 normal tissue samples and benign neoplasms. p16 promoter methylation was identified in 5.4 to 43.2% (median 27.86%) of ovarian cancers and 0 to 37.5% (median 15.8%) of normal tissue and benign neoplasms indicating that no significant association exists between p16 promoter methylation and epithelial ovarian cancer. However, the pooled results also showed that the RR was 1.52 (95% CI 0.80-2.87) in the ovarian cancer cases versus the corresponding normal and benign cases under the random-effects model. Between-study heterogeneity was determined through a sensitivity analysis; the I 2 value did not change when one study was excluded.
Conclusions: Our study showed that p16 promoter methylation cannot be used to differentiate benign from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors. Therefore, p16 promoter methylation cannot be used as a marker for diagnosing the early stage of ovarian cancer.
Keywords: Meta-analysis; Methylation; Ovarian cancer; p16.