Mathematical model in post-mortem estimation of brain edema using morphometric parameters

J Forensic Leg Med. 2017 Jan:45:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Nov 27.

Abstract

Current autopsy principles for evaluating the existence of brain edema are based on a macroscopic subjective assessment performed by pathologists. The gold standard is a time-consuming histological verification of the presence of the edema. By measuring the diameters of the cranial cavity, as individually determined morphometric parameters, a mathematical model for rapid evaluation of brain edema was created, based on the brain weight measured during the autopsy. A cohort study was performed on 110 subjects, divided into two groups according to the histological presence or absence of (the - deleted from the text) brain edema. In all subjects, the following measures were determined: the volume and the diameters of the cranial cavity (longitudinal and transverse distance and height), the brain volume, and the brain weight. The complex mathematical algorithm revealed a formula for the coefficient ε, which is useful to conclude whether a brain edema is present or not. The average density of non-edematous brain is 0.967 g/ml, while the average density of edematous brain is 1.148 g/ml. The resulting formula for the coefficient ε is (5.79 x longitudinal distance x transverse distance)/brain weight. Coefficient ε can be calculated using measurements of the diameters of the cranial cavity and the brain weight, performed during the autopsy. If the resulting ε is less than 0.9484, it could be stated that there is cerebral edema with a reliability of 98.5%. The method discussed in this paper aims to eliminate the burden of relying on subjective assessments when determining the presence of a brain edema.

Keywords: Autopsy; Brain edema; Brain swelling; Cranial cavity.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Algorithms
  • Brain / pathology
  • Brain Edema / pathology*
  • Cohort Studies
  • Forensic Pathology / methods
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Theoretical*
  • Organ Size
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Young Adult