[Treatment of mandibular angle fracture through intraoral and extraoral approach: a comparative study]

Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2016 Aug;25(4):500-503.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the clinical effects of mandibular angle fracture surgery through intraoral and extraoral approach.

Methods: From January 2008 to December 2014, 46 patients with mandibular angle fracture were retrospectively recruited in this study. An intraoral approach was used in 22 cases as group 1 in whom the fractures were fixed by one titanium miniplate alone, the others through an extraoral approach as group 2 in whom the fractures were fixed by two plates. Intermaxillary traction was used in all patients for 3 weeks following the operation. The data was collected in MS Excel 2003 and further analyzed by SPSS13.0 software package.

Results: The wound healing was in uneventful group 1, no complication occurred 3 weeks later. On the contrary, 5 cases with postoperative infection and 3 cases with temporary weakness of facial nerve were observed in the group 2. Three months later, postoperative panoramic radiographs showed mandible fractures healed well in group 1; while in group 2, three cases complained of unhealed fractures and unsatisfactory occlusion.

Conclusions: Compared with extraoral approach to manage mandibular angle fracture with 2 miniplates, one miniplate through intraoral approach can provide better outcomes.

MeSH terms

  • Bone Plates*
  • Dental Occlusion*
  • Facial Nerve
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal*
  • Humans
  • Mandibular Fractures / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Postoperative Period
  • Radiography, Panoramic
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Titanium
  • Traction

Substances

  • Titanium