Uptake of evidence-based physical activity programs: comparing perceptions of adopters and nonadopters

Transl Behav Med. 2016 Dec;6(4):629-637. doi: 10.1007/s13142-015-0371-7.

Abstract

Translating evidence-based physical activity interventions into practice have been problematic. Limited research exists on the adoption decision-making process. This study explored health educator perceptions of two evidence-based, physical activity programs-one was developed through an integrated research-practice partnership approach (FitEx) and the other was research-developed, Active Living Every Day (ALED). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 health educators who were trained on either ALED (n = 6) or FitEx (n = 6) and had either delivered (n = 6) or did not deliver (n = 6) the intervention. Program adopters identified with program characteristics, materials, processes, implementation, fit within system, and collaborations as more positive factors in decision-making when compared to those that did not deliver. FitEx health educators were more likely to deliver the program and found it to be a better fit and easier to use. An integrated research-practice partnership may improve adoption of physical activity programs in typical practice settings.

Keywords: Adoption; Decision-making; Integrated research-practice partnerships; Physical activity promotion; Qualitative.

Publication types

  • Pragmatic Clinical Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adoption / psychology*
  • Adult
  • Cooperative Behavior
  • Decision Making / physiology
  • Exercise / psychology*
  • Female
  • Health Promotion / methods
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Perception / physiology*