A Root-Colonizing Pseudomonad Lessens Stress Responses in Wheat Imposed by CuO Nanoparticles

PLoS One. 2016 Oct 24;11(10):e0164635. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164635. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Nanoparticle (NPs) containing essential metals are being considered in formulations of fertilizers to boost plant nutrition in soils with low metal bioavailability. This paper addresses whether colonization of wheat roots by the bacterium, Pseudomonas chlororaphis O6 (PcO6), protected roots from the reduced elongation caused by CuO NPs. There was a trend for slightly elongated roots when seedlings with roots colonized by PcO6 were grown with CuO NPs; the density of bacterial cells on the root surface was not altered by the NPs. Accumulations of reactive oxygen species in the plant root cells caused by CuO NPs were little affected by root colonization. However, bacterial colonization did reduce the extent of expression of an array of genes associated with plant responses to stress induced by root exposure to CuO NPs. PcO6 colonization also reduced the levels of two important chelators of Cu ions, citric and malic acids, in the rhizosphere solution; presumably because these acids were used as nutrients for bacterial growth. There was a trend for lower levels of soluble Cu in the rhizosphere solution and reduced Cu loads in the true leaves with PcO6 colonization. These studies indicate that root colonization by bacterial cells modulates plant responses to contact with CuO NPs.

MeSH terms

  • Copper / pharmacology*
  • Nanoparticles*
  • Plant Roots / microbiology*
  • Pseudomonas / growth & development
  • Pseudomonas / isolation & purification*
  • Stress, Physiological*
  • Triticum / physiology*

Substances

  • Copper
  • cuprous oxide

Grants and funding

AA, DB and JM are grateful to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA-CSREES) grant 2011-03581, AA and DB to support from the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, and JM to funds from the Utah Water Research Laboratory. Utah Agricultural Experiment Station (Journal Paper 8921). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.