The influence of intention, outcome and question-wording on children's and adults' moral judgments

Cognition. 2016 Dec:157:190-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.019. Epub 2016 Sep 17.

Abstract

The influence of intention and outcome information on moral judgments was investigated by telling children aged 4-8yearsandadults (N=169) stories involving accidental harms (positive intention, negative outcome) or attempted harms (negative intention, positive outcome) from two studies (Helwig, Zelazo, & Wilson, 2001; Zelazo, Helwig, & Lau, 1996). When the original acceptability (wrongness) question was asked, the original findings were closely replicated: children's and adults' acceptability judgments were based almost exclusively on outcome, and children's punishment judgments were also primarily outcome-based. However, when this question was rephrased, 4-5-year-olds' judgments were approximately equally influenced by intention and outcome, and from 5-6years they were based considerably more on intention than outcome. These findings indicate that, for methodological reasons, children's (and adults') ability to make intention-based judgment has often been substantially underestimated.

Keywords: Acceptability; Intention; Moral development; Moral judgment; Outcome; Punishment; Replication.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Child
  • Child Development
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intention*
  • Judgment*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Morals*
  • Psychology, Child
  • Punishment
  • Social Perception*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Young Adult