Should MRAs be at the front row in heart failure? A plea for the early use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in medical therapy for heart failure based on clinical experience

Heart Fail Rev. 2016 Nov;21(6):699-701. doi: 10.1007/s10741-016-9583-2.

Abstract

The brand new 2016 ESC guidelines for the treatment of acute and chronic heart failure continue to give a prominent place to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In the prevention of HF hospitalization and death, a class I, level of recommendation A, is given to MRAs for patients with HFrEF, who remain symptomatic despite treatment with an ACE-inhibitor and a beta-blocker and have an LVEF below 35 %. This recommendation is primarily based on two landmark trials, the RALES trial (for spironolactone) and the EMPHASIS-HF trial (for eplerenone). A crucial question is, however, why MRAs are advised only in "third place," i.e., after optimal up-titration of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers. We wonder whether MRAs could not or should not be given earlier in the treatment of HFrEF, namely before or together with the up-titration of ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers. Several arguments to support this plea are described in this short paper.

Keywords: Eplerenone; Heart failure guidelines; Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist; Spironolactone.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Eplerenone
  • Heart Failure / drug therapy*
  • Humans
  • Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists / therapeutic use*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Spironolactone / analogs & derivatives
  • Spironolactone / therapeutic use
  • Stroke Volume*

Substances

  • Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists
  • Spironolactone
  • Eplerenone