A Tricky Trait: Applying the Fruits of the "Function Debate" in the Philosophy of Biology to the "Venom Debate" in the Science of Toxinology

Toxins (Basel). 2016 Sep 7;8(9):263. doi: 10.3390/toxins8090263.

Abstract

The "function debate" in the philosophy of biology and the "venom debate" in the science of toxinology are conceptually related. Venom systems are complex multifunctional traits that have evolved independently numerous times throughout the animal kingdom. No single concept of function, amongst those popularly defended, appears adequate to describe these systems in all their evolutionary contexts and extant variations. As such, a pluralistic view of function, previously defended by some philosophers of biology, is most appropriate. Venom systems, like many other functional traits, exist in nature as points on a continuum and the boundaries between "venomous" and "non-venomous" species may not always be clearly defined. This paper includes a brief overview of the concept of function, followed by in-depth discussion of its application to venom systems. A sound understanding of function may aid in moving the venom debate forward. Similarly, consideration of a complex functional trait such as venom may be of interest to philosophers of biology.

Keywords: debate; evolution; function; philosophy; science; venom.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Physiological
  • Animals
  • Evolution, Molecular*
  • Genotype
  • Humans
  • Models, Biological*
  • Phenotype
  • Philosophy*
  • Snake Bites / metabolism
  • Snake Bites / pathology
  • Snakes / genetics
  • Snakes / metabolism
  • Snakes / physiology*
  • Toxicology*
  • Venoms* / genetics
  • Venoms* / metabolism
  • Venoms* / toxicity

Substances

  • Venoms