Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is associated with significant postoperative pain. Both lumbar epidurals and lumbar plexus nerve blocks have been described for postoperative pain control, but it is unclear if one technique is more beneficial.
Methods: Using electronic medical records, a randomly selected, cohort of 58 patients with lumbar epidurals were compared with 58 patients with lumbar plexus nerve blocks following primary THA. The primary end point was 48-hour postoperative opiate consumption. Secondary end points included time of first ambulation, distance ambulated, level of assistance with ambulation, presence of side effects, and time to discharge. Descriptive statistics were calculated to characterize subjects in the different block-type groups. Comparisons in morphine consumption were conducted using linear mixed models. Primary and secondary end points were examined in multivariable models.
Results: Patients with lumbar plexus blocks consumed less opiates at 24, 36, and 48 hours relative to patients that received lumbar epidural catheters (P = .047, .002, and .002, respectively). Patients with lumbar plexus blocks ambulated earlier (24.6 ± 2.01 hours vs 31.7 ± 3.01 hours) and farther relative to patients with epidurals (P < .001 for both) and had discharge orders written earlier (58.2 ± 6.68 hours vs 73.6 ± 6.35 hours).
Conclusion: In comparison to lumbar epidural catheters, lumbar plexus nerve blocks are an effective pathway for postoperative pain control following primary THA. Furthermore, this clinical pathway expedites physical rehabilitation and is more compatible with postoperative prophylactic anticoagulants.
Keywords: analgesia; arthroplasty; epidural; nerve block; pain; postoperative.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.