The human knee is one of the most investigated joints in the human body. Various test setups exist to measure and analyse knee kinematics in vitro which differ in a wide range of parameters. The purpose of this article is to find an answer to the question if the test setup influences the kinematic outcome of studies and to what extend the results can be compared. To answer this question, we compared the tibial rotation as a function of flexion angle presented in 19 published studies. Raw data was extracted via image segmentation from the graphs depicted in these publications and the differences between the publications was analysed. Additionally, all test setups were compared regarding four aspects: method for angle calculation, system for data acquisition, loading condition and testing rig design. The resulting correlation matrix shows the influence of the test setup on the study outcome. Our results indicate that each study needs to collect its own reference data. Finally, we provide a mean internal rotation as a function of flexion angle based on more than 140 specimens tested in 14 different studies.
Keywords: Kinematics; Knee; Meta-analysis; Tibial rotation.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.