A multiplex (m)PCR and a PCR followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of Avibacterium paragallinarum have been proposed as alternatives to conventional serotyping by the Page scheme. We evaluated both methods, and also sequenced the PCR-RFLP target fragment to reexamine the capacity of molecular serotyping. Eleven reference strains and 27 field isolates were used. Many reference strains and isolates were misidentified as Page serogroup B. The sequence analysis revealed 6 profiles based on the matching rates of the target sequence with the 3 reverse primers of the mPCR. The reference strains and field isolates in profiles 1 and 4 were correctly identified as serogroup A or C by the mPCR. The strains and/or isolates in profiles 2, 3, 5, and 6 could be misidentified as serogroup B or as nontypeable by the mPCR. The homology comparison of the sequences showed that the target sequence of the mPCR, called region 2, was not Page serogroup specific, although some Kume serovars, such as A-1 and C-2, were correctly serotyped. In addition, there was a 9 nucleotide deletion in the sequences of profiles 1, 3, and 5, but not of profiles 2, 4, and 6. Overall, we confirmed that the mPCR and PCR-RFLP molecular assays are not suitable for identifying the serogroups of A. paragallinarum isolates. With further study, analysis of region 2 sequences may have potential as a means of recognizing the Kume serovars of A. paragallinarum isolates.
Keywords: Avibacterium paragallinarum; PCR-RFLP; infectious coryza; multiplex PCR; profile; region 2 sequence; restriction fragment length polymorphism; serotyping.
© 2016 The Author(s).