Comparison of the co-gasification of sewage sludge and food wastes and cost-benefit analysis of gasification- and incineration-based waste treatment schemes

Bioresour Technol. 2016 Oct:218:595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

Abstract

The compositions of food wastes and their co-gasification producer gas were compared with the existing data of sewage sludge. Results showed that food wastes are more favorable than sewage sludge for co-gasification based on residue generation and energy output. Two decentralized gasification-based schemes were proposed to dispose of the sewage sludge and food wastes in Singapore. Monte Carlo simulation-based cost-benefit analysis was conducted to compare the proposed schemes with the existing incineration-based scheme. It was found that the gasification-based schemes are financially superior to the incineration-based scheme based on the data of net present value (NPV), benefit-cost ratio (BCR), and internal rate of return (IRR). Sensitivity analysis was conducted to suggest effective measures to improve the economics of the schemes.

Keywords: Cost-benefit analysis; Food waste; Gasification; Incineration; Monte Carlo simulation; Sewage sludge.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Conservation of Natural Resources / economics
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / methods
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Food*
  • Gases / chemistry*
  • Humans
  • Incineration* / economics
  • Incineration* / methods
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Sewage / chemistry*
  • Singapore
  • Waste Management* / economics
  • Waste Management* / methods
  • Waste Products*

Substances

  • Gases
  • Sewage
  • Waste Products