Can evolutionary constraints explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in high-latitude forests?

New Phytol. 2016 Sep;211(4):1195-201. doi: 10.1111/nph.14080. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

Abstract

Contents 1195 I. 1195 II. 1196 III. 1196 IV. 1200 1200 References 1200 SUMMARY: The rarity of symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees in temperate and boreal ('high-latitude') forests is curious. One explanation - the evolutionary constraints hypothesis - posits that high-latitude N-fixing trees are rare because few have evolved. Here, we consider traits necessary for high-latitude N-fixing trees. We then use recent developments in trait evolution to estimate that > 2000 and > 500 species could have evolved from low-latitude N-fixing trees and high-latitude N-fixing herbs, respectively. Evolution of N-fixing from nonfixing trees is an unlikely source of diversity. Dispersal limitation seems unlikely to limit high-latitude N-fixer diversity. The greater number of N-fixing species predicted to evolve than currently inhabit high-latitude forests suggests a greater role for ecological than evolutionary constraints.

Keywords: forest; latitudinal gradient; legume; symbiotic nitrogen fixation; trait evolution.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Biodiversity
  • Biological Evolution*
  • Forests*
  • Nitrogen Fixation / physiology*
  • Symbiosis / physiology
  • Trees / physiology*