La mention « non substituable » de la prescription à la délivrance : comparaison des points de vue des médecins généralistes libéraux et des pharmaciens d'officine de la région Midi-Pyrénées

Therapie. 2014 Sep-Oct;69(5):401-17. doi: 10.2515/therapie/2014053.
[Article in French]

Abstract

Background: The "nonrefundable" term use leads to the princep's drug dispensing. The aim of our study was to compare the views of its use between general practitioners and community pharmacists.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive study with similar questionnaires about "nonfundable" term use. A chi-2 test was used in order to detect a difference between the answers of general practitioners ant pharmacists.

Results: The general practitioners and pharmacists views of "nonrefundable" used was different (p<0.05). General practitioners majority used this term because of their patients demand.

Discussion: General practitioners are using the term "nonrefundable" because of their patients demand and they don't integrate this use in their therapeutics decision.

Keywords: décision thérapeutique; generic’s drugs; médicaments génériques; primary cares; soins primaires; substitution; therapeutic decision.

Publication types

  • English Abstract