Efficacy and safety of Linkus, Aminophylline diphenhydramine and acefyllin piperazine for the treatment of cough in children

Pak J Pharm Sci. 2016 May;29(3 Suppl):1027-32.

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Linkus, Aminophylline with Diphenhydramine group and Acefyllin Piperazine with Diphenhydramine cough syrup on children having cough and sleep difficulty associated with cough. To determine the effects of Linkus polyherbal syrup (group A) and compared with other parallel allopathic groups (Group B and C) for cough on children and associated sleep quality and improvement. 360 children having cough inducted in 3 different groups randomly selected. Three parallel groups were the part of the study. The first study group was the herbal syrup Linkus, second group of children were taking a syrup of multinational pharmaceutical industry having Aminophylline plus Diphenhydramine however the third group received another famous brand having Acefyllin Piperazine with Diphenhydramine. Informed assent and informed consent have taken from the study subjects and their parents. Subjects with acute cough were included in the study however the subjects with chronic cough considered to be excluded. Every group of individual in the study was informed about the investigational drugs provided. Ethnic groups, frequency of cough and diseases illness (<0.05) were determine on every group on the investigational syrup. Cough impact on child and its sleep of three different syrups (every group) were assessed on day1 and day 14(p<0.001) via a likert scale. For the evaluation of pain assessment Wong baker face scale were used and level of significance in each group (p<0.001). Significant results were observed in the Linkus Group as compared to the other parallel groups including Aminophylline plus Diphenhydramine and Acefyllin Piperazine with Diphenhydramine on day 14 (p<0.001). Side effects on group B and group C (Aminophylline with Diphenhydramine and Acefyllin Piperazine with Diphenhydramine) were almost similar in number however Linkus syrup has minimum side effects on study duration. Polyherbal syrup Linkus shows better results in treatment of cough including side effects as compare to the other parallel groups B and C (Aminophylline with Diphenhydramine and Acefyllin Piperazine with Diphenhydramine). For nocturnal sleep Linkus providing better results in cough and associated problems. Pain were significantly reduce on day 14 with the herbal Linkus syrup group A (<0.001). Group B and C found less effective with more side effects as compared to Linkus syrup. Poly herbal Linkus syrup could substantially improve the clinical effect and relieves coughs and benefit lung functions and better sleep facilitation.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase IV
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Aminophylline / adverse effects
  • Aminophylline / therapeutic use*
  • Antitussive Agents / adverse effects
  • Antitussive Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Bronchodilator Agents / adverse effects
  • Bronchodilator Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cough / complications
  • Cough / drug therapy*
  • Cough / physiopathology
  • Diphenhydramine / adverse effects
  • Diphenhydramine / therapeutic use*
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / adverse effects
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives / therapeutic use*
  • Male
  • Pakistan
  • Pharyngitis / drug therapy*
  • Pharyngitis / etiology
  • Pharyngitis / physiopathology
  • Sleep / drug effects*
  • Sleep Wake Disorders / drug therapy*
  • Sleep Wake Disorders / etiology
  • Sleep Wake Disorders / physiopathology
  • Theophylline / adverse effects
  • Theophylline / analogs & derivatives*
  • Theophylline / therapeutic use
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antitussive Agents
  • Bronchodilator Agents
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • acefyllin piperazinate
  • Aminophylline
  • Diphenhydramine
  • Theophylline