Genetic Effects and Heterosis of Yield and Yield Component Traits Based on Gossypium Barbadense Chromosome Segment Substitution Lines in Two Gossypium Hirsutum Backgrounds

PLoS One. 2016 Jun 27;11(6):e0157978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157978. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

We hybridized 10 chromosome segment substitution lines (CSSLs) each from two CSSL populations and produced 50 F1 hybrids according to North Carolina Design II. We analyzed the genetic effects and heterosis of yield and yield components in the F1 hybrids and parents in four environments via the additive-dominance genetic model. Yield and yield components of the CSSLs were controlled by combined additive and dominance effects, and lint percentage was mainly controlled by additive effects, but boll weight, boll number, seedcotton yield and lint yield were mainly controlled by dominance effects. We detected significant interaction effects between genetics and the environment for all yields traits. Similar interactions were detected between two CSSL populations (Pop CCRI 36 and Pop CCRI 45). Significant positive mid-parent heterosis was detected for all yield traits in both populations, and significant positive better-parent heterosis was also detected for all yield traits except lint percentage. The differences among parents were relatively small, but significant heterosis was detected for yield and yield components. Therefore, the relationship between heterosis and genetic distance for yield traits is complicated and requires further study. These CSSLs represent useful tools for improving yield and yield components in cotton.

MeSH terms

  • Chromosomes, Plant / genetics*
  • Genetic Background*
  • Gossypium / genetics*
  • Gossypium / growth & development
  • Hybrid Vigor*
  • Mutation
  • Plant Breeding / methods
  • Quantitative Trait, Heritable*

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31101188), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2012AA101108), and the National Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project for CAAS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.