A Large and Phylogenetically Diverse Class of Type 1 Opsins Lacking a Canonical Retinal Binding Site

PLoS One. 2016 Jun 21;11(6):e0156543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156543. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Opsins are photosensitive proteins catalyzing light-dependent processes across the tree of life. For both microbial (type 1) and metazoan (type 2) opsins, photosensing depends upon covalent interaction between a retinal chromophore and a conserved lysine residue. Despite recent discoveries of potential opsin homologs lacking this residue, phylogenetic dispersal and functional significance of these abnormal sequences have not yet been investigated. We report discovery of a large group of putatively non-retinal binding opsins, present in a number of fungal and microbial genomes and comprising nearly 30% of opsins in the Halobacteriacea, a model clade for opsin photobiology. We report phylogenetic analyses, structural modeling, genomic context analysis and biochemistry, to describe the evolutionary relationship of these recently described proteins with other opsins, show that they are expressed and do not bind retinal in a canonical manner. Given these data, we propose a hypothesis that these abnormal opsin homologs may represent a novel family of sensory opsins which may be involved in taxis response to one or more non-light stimuli. If true, this finding would challenge our current understanding of microbial opsins as a light-specific sensory family, and provides a potential analogy with the highly diverse signaling capabilities of the eukaryotic G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), of which metazoan type 2 opsins are a light-specific sub-clade.

MeSH terms

  • Absorption, Radiation
  • Archaea / metabolism
  • Bacteria / metabolism
  • Binding Sites
  • Conserved Sequence
  • Light
  • Opsins / metabolism*
  • Phylogeny*
  • Retinaldehyde / metabolism*
  • Signal Transduction

Substances

  • Opsins
  • Retinaldehyde

Grants and funding

Funding for this work came from the National Science Foundation [EF0949453] and departmental and bridge funds to MTF. The funder provided support in the form of salaries for author PMS, AIY, EAB and MTF but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.