Purpose: Metaphyseal forearm fractures are a common pathology in any emergency department. The standard diagnostic procedure is an X-ray of the forearm and wrist. Former studies have shown that these fractures can be visualized by ultrasound. The intention of this study was to evaluate the safety and reliability of the ultrasound diagnostic procedure in comparison with X-ray diagnosis.
Methods: Patients aged 0-12 years with tentative diagnosis of forearm fracture in a physical examination were then examined, from six positions, with a 7.5-MHz linear array transducer. The diagnosis and the recommended treatment were noted, after which standard X-rays were taken. Finally, differences between diagnoses, the extent and direction of the deformity, and the treatment recommended after both diagnostic procedures were analysed.
Results: From January 2007 to May 2008, 93 patients were examined. We found 77 fractures in 64 patients (48 radius, 2 physeal fractures of the radius, 1 ulna, and 13 radius and ulna). The sensitivity of ultrasound in diagnosing forearm fractures was 94%, and the specificity was 99%. Difference between the means of the deformities were 1.6° (radius anterior-posterior direction), 1.6° (radius medial-lateral direction), 0.2° (ulna anterior-posterior direction), and 0.2° (ulna medial-lateral direction).
Conclusion: Ultrasound seems to be a valuable and safe alternative to X-ray diagnosis.
Keywords: Diagnostic; Forearm fracture; Juvenile fracture; Ultrasonography.