Diagnostic significance of circulating multiple miRNAs in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Biomark Med. 2016 Jun;10(6):661-74. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2015-0017. Epub 2016 May 27.

Abstract

Aims: To determine whether circulating multiple miRNAs can be used as novel biomarkers for the diagnosis in breast cancer, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Materials & methods: After searching the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science, we used the bivariate meta-analysis model to summarize the diagnostic indices and plot the summary receiver operator characteristic curve.

Results: The summary estimates revealed that the pooled sensitivity was 88% (95% CI: 82-93%); specificity was 84% (95% CI: 74-91%); positive likelihood ratio was 4.69 (95% CI: 2.93-7.51); negative likelihood ratio was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.09-0.25); diagnostic odds ratio was 38.21 (95% CI: 13.41-108.85); and the area under the curve was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95).

Conclusion: These results suggested that circulating multiple miRNAs might serve as novel biomarkers for breast cancer, with a relatively high level of accuracy.

Keywords: breast cancer; circulating multiple miRNAs; diagnosis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Area Under Curve
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Breast Neoplasms / genetics
  • Databases, Factual
  • Female
  • Humans
  • MicroRNAs / blood*
  • ROC Curve
  • Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Substances

  • MicroRNAs