Tongue reduction for OSAHS: TORSs vs coblations, technologies vs techniques, apples vs oranges

Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Feb;274(2):637-645. doi: 10.1007/s00405-016-4112-4. Epub 2016 May 24.

Abstract

Coblation tongue surgery and Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) proved to be the most published therapeutical options for the treatment of patients affected by obstructive sleep apneas (OSAHS). A systematic review of the literature and an analysis of the data are presented. The mean rates of failure were 34.4 and 38.5 %, respectively in TORS and Coblation groups. Complications occurred in 21.3 % of the patients treated with TORS and in 8.4 % of the patients treated with Coblation surgery. TORS seems to give slightly better results, allowing a wider surgical view and a measurable, more consistent removal of lingual tissue. However, the higher rate of minor complication and the significant costs of TORS must also be considered. Moreover, both technologies may be applied to a wide range of surgical techniques, each of them with different effectiveness.

Keywords: Coblation; OSAHS; Technology; Tongue base; Trans oral robotic surgery.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Glossectomy / methods*
  • Humans
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Sleep Apnea, Obstructive / surgery*
  • Treatment Outcome