Evaluation of the intercept oral specimen collection device with HIV assays versus paired serum/plasma specimens

J Virol Methods. 2016 Aug:234:164-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 30.

Abstract

Oral fluid has many advantages over blood-based techniques: it is less invasive, eliminates the occupational risk associated with needle stick accidents and collection can be self-administrated. Each individual test is packaged with a corresponding collection device. This study tested the suitability of the Intercept Oral Specimen Collection Device for different HIV diagnostic tests: three different rapid HIV tests and two adapted ELISAs, which were evaluated and compared with a gold standard on blood. In addition a total IgG quantification was performed to demonstrate the quality of the specimen. HIV antibodies were detected with a sensitivity of 100%, 99.3%, 98.6%, 100% and 95.7% for, DPP, OraQuick, Aware, Genscreen and Vironostika respectively using the Intercept Collection Device. Respective specificities were 100%, 100%, 99.3%, 97.3% and 100%.

Keywords: HIV rapid test; Intercept; Oral fluid.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • AIDS Serodiagnosis*
  • Adult
  • Female
  • HIV Antibodies / analysis*
  • HIV Antibodies / blood
  • HIV Infections / diagnosis
  • HIV Infections / virology
  • HIV-1 / immunology*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
  • Saliva / virology*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Specimen Handling / instrumentation*
  • Specimen Handling / methods
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • HIV Antibodies
  • Reagent Kits, Diagnostic