De-Risking Immunotherapy: Report of a Consensus Workshop of the Cancer Immunotherapy Consortium of the Cancer Research Institute

Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Apr;4(4):279-88. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0045.

Abstract

With the recent FDA approvals of pembrolizumab and nivolumab, and a host of additional immunomodulatory agents entering clinical development each year, the field of cancer immunotherapy is changing rapidly. Strategies that can assist researchers in choosing the most promising drugs and drug combinations to move forward through clinical development are badly needed in order to reduce the likelihood of late-stage clinical trial failures. On October 5, 2014, the Cancer Immunotherapy Consortium of the Cancer Research Institute, a collaborative think tank composed of stakeholders from academia, industry, regulatory agencies, and patient interest groups, met to discuss strategies for de-risking immunotherapy development, with a focus on integrating preclinical and clinical studies, and conducting smarter early-phase trials, particularly for combination therapies. Several recommendations were made, including making better use of clinical data to inform preclinical research, obtaining adequate tissues for biomarker studies, and choosing appropriate clinical trial endpoints to identify promising drug candidates and combinations in nonrandomized early-phase trials.

Publication types

  • Consensus Development Conference
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / pharmacology
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal / therapeutic use
  • Cancer Vaccines / immunology
  • Cancer Vaccines / therapeutic use
  • Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic
  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Disease Models, Animal
  • Drug Discovery
  • Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy* / adverse effects
  • Immunotherapy* / methods
  • Mice
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy
  • Neoplasms / immunology*
  • Neoplasms / therapy*

Substances

  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • Cancer Vaccines