Neural stem/progenitor cell transplantation for spinal cord injury treatment; A systematic review and meta-analysis

Neuroscience. 2016 May 13:322:377-97. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.034. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

Abstract

Despite the vast improvements of cell therapy in spinal cord injury treatment, no optimum protocol has been developed for application of neural stem/progenitor cells. In this regard, the present meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of the neural stem/progenitor cell (NSPC) transplantation depends mainly on injury model, intervention phase, transplanted cell count, immunosuppressive use, and probably stem cell source. Improved functional recovery post NSPC transplantation was found to be higher in transection and contusion models. Moreover, NSPC transplantation in acute phase of spinal injury was found to have better functional recovery. Higher doses (>3×10(6)cell/kg) were also shown to be optimum for transplantation, but immunosuppressive agent administration negatively affected the motor function recovery. Scaffold use in NSPC transplantation could also effectively raise functional recovery.

Keywords: functional recovery; neural stem cells; neuropathic pain; spinal cord injuries.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / pharmacology
  • Immunosuppressive Agents / therapeutic use
  • Neural Stem Cells / cytology
  • Neural Stem Cells / physiology
  • Neural Stem Cells / transplantation*
  • Pain / physiopathology
  • Spinal Cord Injuries / physiopathology
  • Spinal Cord Injuries / therapy*
  • Stem Cell Transplantation / methods*

Substances

  • Immunosuppressive Agents