Single-site Versus Multiport Robotic Hysterectomy in Benign Gynecologic Diseases: A Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes and Cost Analysis

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 May-Jun;23(4):603-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the surgical outcomes and costs of robotic-assisted hysterectomy with the single-site (RSSH) or multiport approach (RH).

Design: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database (Canadian Task Force classification II1).

Setting: A university hospital.

Patients: Consecutive women who underwent robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for the treatment of benign gynecologic diseases.

Interventions: Data on surgical approach, surgical outcomes, and costs were collected in a prospective database and retrospectively analyzed.

Measurements and main results: The total operative time, console time, docking time, estimated blood loss, conversion rate, and surgical complications rate were compared between the 2 study groups. Cost analysis was performed. One hundred four patients underwent total robotic-assisted hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (45 RSSH and 59 RH). There was no significant difference in the indications for surgery and in the characteristics of the patients between the 2 study groups. There was no significant difference between the single-site and multiport approach in console time, surgical complication rate, conversion rate, and postoperative pain. The docking time was lower in the RH group (p = .0001). The estimated blood loss and length of hospitalization were lower in the RSSH group (p = .0008 and p = .009, respectively). The cost analysis showed significant differences in favor of RSSH.

Conclusion: RSSH should be preferred to RH when hysterectomy is performed for benign disease because it could be at least as equally effective and safe with a potential cost reduction. However, because of the high cost and absence of clear advantages, the robotic approach should be considered only for selected patients.

Keywords: Complications; Costs; Robotic hysterectomy; Robotic-assisted laparoscopy; Single-port robotic hysterectomy; Single-site robotic hysterectomy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Canada
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Female
  • Genital Diseases, Female / economics
  • Genital Diseases, Female / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Hysterectomy / economics
  • Hysterectomy / methods*
  • Laparoscopy / economics
  • Laparoscopy / methods
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Ovariectomy / economics
  • Ovariectomy / methods
  • Pain, Postoperative / economics
  • Pain, Postoperative / etiology
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / economics
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / methods*