Cost-Effective Marine Protection--A Pragmatic Approach

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0147085. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147085. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

This paper puts forward a framework for probabilistic and holistic cost-effectiveness analysis to provide support in selecting the least-cost set of measures to reach a multidimensional environmental objective. Following the principles of ecosystem-based management, the framework includes a flexible methodology for deriving and populating criteria for effectiveness and costs and analyzing complex ecological-economic trade-offs under uncertainty. The framework is applied in the development of the Finnish Programme of Measures (PoM) for reaching the targets of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). The numerical results demonstrate that substantial cost savings can be realized from careful consideration of the costs and multiple effects of management measures. If adopted, the proposed PoM would yield improvements in the state of the Baltic Sea, but the overall objective of the MSFD would not be reached by the target year of 2020; for various environmental and administrative reasons, it would take longer for most measures to take full effect.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Conservation of Natural Resources / economics
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / methods*
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Ecosystem
  • Environmental Monitoring / economics
  • Environmental Monitoring / methods*
  • European Union
  • Finland
  • Models, Statistical
  • Oceans and Seas
  • Probability

Grants and funding

JS was supported by the DEVOTES project (DEVelopment Of innovative Tools for understanding marine biodiversity and assessing good Environmental Status), funded by the European Union under the 7th Framework Program ‘The Ocean of Tomorrow’ Theme (grant agreement no. 308392), and SO was supported by the ECA (Economics of Aquatic Foodwebs) project, funded by the Academy of Finland’s Research Programme on Sustainable Governance of Aquatic Resources. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.