Construction of Radial Defect Models in Rabbits to Determine the Critical Size Defects

PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146301. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Many studies aimed at investigating bone repair have been conducted through animal models in recent years. However, limitations do exist in these models due to varying regeneration potential among different animal species. Even using the same animal, big differences exist in the size of critical size defects (CSD) involving the same region. This study aimed to investigate the standardization of radial bone defect models in rabbits and further establish more reliable CSD data. A total of 40 6-month-old New Zealand white rabbits of clean grade totaling 80 radial bones were prepared for bone defect models, according to the principle of randomization. Five different sizes (1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 1.7 and 2.0 cm) of complete periosteal defects were introduced under anesthesia. At 12 weeks postoperatively, with the gradual increase in defect size, the grades of bone growth were significantly decreased in all 5 groups. X-ray, CT scans and H&E staining of the 1.4, 1.7, and 2.0-cm groups showed lower grades of bone growth than that of the 1.0 and 1.2-cm groups respectively (P < 0.05). Using rabbit radial defect model involving 6-month-old healthy New Zealand white rabbits, this study indicates that in order to be critical sized, defects must be greater than 1.4 cm.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bone Regeneration / physiology*
  • Models, Animal
  • Rabbits
  • Radius / growth & development*

Grants and funding

This study was in part supported by Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau youth Foundation (2012-138, Zhao MD and 2012-167, Huang JS), Nature Science Foundation (81202160, Huang JS), Shanghai Health and Family Planning Commission Project (2014-403, Zhang XC) and Shanghai Young Physician Training Program (2012-30, 2012-31, Zhao MD). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.