Gaze in Visual Search Is Guided More Efficiently by Positive Cues than by Negative Cues

PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145910. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Visual search can be accelerated when properties of the target are known. Such knowledge allows the searcher to direct attention to items sharing these properties. Recent work indicates that information about properties of non-targets (i.e., negative cues) can also guide search. In the present study, we examine whether negative cues lead to different search behavior compared to positive cues. We asked observers to search for a target defined by a certain shape singleton (broken line among solid lines). Each line was embedded in a colored disk. In "positive cue" blocks, participants were informed about possible colors of the target item. In "negative cue" blocks, the participants were informed about colors that could not contain the target. Search displays were designed such that with both the positive and negative cues, the same number of items could potentially contain the broken line ("relevant items"). Thus, both cues were equally informative. We measured response times and eye movements. Participants exhibited longer response times when provided with negative cues compared to positive cues. Although negative cues did guide the eyes to relevant items, there were marked differences in eye movements. Negative cues resulted in smaller proportions of fixations on relevant items, longer duration of fixations and in higher rates of fixations per item as compared to positive cues. The effectiveness of both cue types, as measured by fixations on relevant items, increased over the course of each search. In sum, a negative color cue can guide attention to relevant items, but it is less efficient than a positive cue of the same informational value.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Cues*
  • Eye Movements*
  • Female
  • Fixation, Ocular*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Photic Stimulation
  • Reaction Time
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Grant 01 EO0901), and by DFG cluster of excellence CoTeSys (www.cotesys.org), SFB/TRR135 (WE) and HA 6861/2-1 (BMtH). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. EyeSeeTec GmbH did not provide salaries for any author during the study design, data collection and analysis, or decision to publish. EyeSeeTec did provide salaries for two authors [GK, SK] in the final stage of the revision, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.