Objective: Our objective is to compare the predictive accuracy of 4 recently established stroke mortality scores in the Chinese population, including the Get With The Guidelines-Stroke risk score, the iScore prediction rule for 30-day mortality, the iScore prediction rule for 1-year mortality, and the PLAN score.
Methods: We analyzed data from 9698 hospitalized patients with acute ischemic stroke in the China National Stroke Registry (September 2007-August 2008). Outcome measures were in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality. To evaluate the performance of each model, we calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared using the z-test.
Results: Among 9698 patients, the mean age was 65.5 years and 38.6% were female. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and 1-year mortality were 3.0%, 5.9%, and 14.6%, respectively. The AUC values of 4 scores for each outcome were all more than .75. The z-test did not show significant difference among the AUC values of these 4 scores. For patients who received thrombolysis therapy, these 4 scores had apparent reductions in the AUC values.
Conclusions: We could confirm the predictive value of all these 4 scores for short-term and long-term mortalities in Chinese IS patients. However, these 4 scores need to be interpreted with caution in the patients who received thrombolysis therapy.
Keywords: Ischemic stroke; mortality; prognosis; risk factor.
Copyright © 2015 National Stroke Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.