Subcutaneous Immunotherapy and Sublingual Immunotherapy: Comparative Efficacy, Current and Potential Indications, and Warnings--United States Versus Europe

Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2016 Feb;36(1):13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2015.08.005.

Abstract

Subcutaneous immunotherapy and sublingual immunotherapy are effective for allergic rhinitis and allergic asthma and with some support for use in selected patients with atopic dermatitis. The sequence of immunologic responses is the same, irrespective of the route of administration, and similar disease modification has been demonstrated. However, there are differences between the two approaches. The most important is the greatly reduced likelihood of sublingual immunotherapy producing systemic reactions. There are major drawbacks for sublingual immunotherapy in regard to dosing. Finally, there is the question of relative clinical efficacy, with the currently available data favoring subcutaneous immunotherapy.

Keywords: AIT; Allergic asthma; Allergic rhinitis; Immunotherapy; SCIT; SLIT.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Administration, Sublingual
  • Allergens / immunology*
  • Animals
  • Desensitization, Immunologic*
  • Europe
  • Humans
  • Hypersensitivity / immunology
  • Hypersensitivity / therapy*
  • Injections, Subcutaneous
  • United States

Substances

  • Allergens