Less Aggressive Surgical Procedure for Treatment of Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor: Limited Experience from a Single Institute

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0143452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143452. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical characteristics and radiological features of solid pseudopapillary tumor (SPT) and assess surgical therapy strategy.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed in 62 patients pathologically confirmed of SPT treated between 2003 and 2014. The clinical features, radiological examinations and surgical strategies were analyzed.

Results: 56 females and 6 males were included in this study, mean age was 26 years old (range: 8-66 years old) with mean size of the tumor was 7.2 cm (range: 3-15 cm), and most tumor were commonly located in the head of pancreas (n = 29). Among all the cases, 3 patients had liver metastasis and underwent resection of SPT and liver metastasis. Furthermore, we performed 29 cases of local tumor excision; other patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, middle pancreatectomy, middle pancreatectomy with splenectomy, distal pancreatectomy with spleen preservation, distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy and duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. No patient suffered from lymph node metastases. After median follow-up of 46 months (range: 2-135 months), no mortality or local recurrence or distant metastasis was found.

Conclusions: Solid pseudopapillary tumor is a latent malignant tumor with excellent prognosis. If feasible, less aggressive resection without regular lymphadenectomy is recommended for treatment of patients with SPT.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Papillary / diagnostic imaging
  • Carcinoma, Papillary / surgery*
  • Child
  • Demography
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Preoperative Care
  • Radiography, Abdominal
  • Survival Analysis
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

The authors have no support or funding to report.