Ocelot Population Status in Protected Brazilian Atlantic Forest

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 11;10(11):e0141333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141333. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Forest fragmentation and habitat loss are detrimental to top carnivores, such as jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor), but effects on mesocarnivores, such as ocelots (Leopardus pardalis), are less clear. Ocelots need native forests, but also might benefit from the local extirpation of larger cats such as pumas and jaguars through mesopredator release. We used a standardized camera trap protocol to assess ocelot populations in six protected areas of the Atlantic forest in southeastern Brazil where over 80% of forest remnants are < 50 ha. We tested whether variation in ocelot abundance could be explained by reserve size, forest cover, number of free-ranging domestic dogs and presence of top predators. Ocelot abundance was positively correlated with reserve size and the presence of top predators (jaguar and pumas) and negatively correlated with the number of dogs. We also found higher detection probabilities in less forested areas as compared to larger, intact forests. We suspect that smaller home ranges and higher movement rates in smaller, more degraded areas increased detection. Our data do not support the hypothesis of mesopredator release. Rather, our findings indicate that ocelots respond negatively to habitat loss, and thrive in large protected areas inhabited by top predators.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animal Distribution
  • Animals
  • Brazil
  • Cats / physiology
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / methods*
  • Dogs / physiology
  • Ecosystem*
  • Felidae / physiology*
  • Forests*
  • Geography
  • Models, Theoretical
  • Panthera / physiology
  • Population Density
  • Population Dynamics
  • Predatory Behavior
  • Puma / physiology

Grants and funding

The study was funded by The Brazilian Science Council (CNPq 472802/2010-0 - Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico - http://www.cnpq.br) and Minas Gerais Science Foundation (FAPEMIG APQ 01145-10 - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais - http://www.fapemig.br). The Brazilian Coordination of Higher Studies (CAPES- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - http://www.capes.gov.br) and CNPq provided grants to AMOP. CNPq and FAPEMIG provided grants to RLM. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.