Different Omega-3 Formulations Yield to Diverse Clinical Response: A Case-Report

Curr Drug Saf. 2016;11(2):177-80. doi: 10.2174/1574886311666151106120928.

Abstract

Treatment guidelines recommend omega-3 with Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) and Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) content not above 85% in patients with high plasma levels of triglycerides. Since the different up to date formulation of omega-3 available in commerce must be similar to clinical efficacy and safety, herein, we report the case a 52-year-old woman who presented clinical inefficacy using Olevia(®) omega-3 treatment. Clinical evaluation excluded the presence of intestinal or systemic diseases able to reduce the drug absorption. Switching the therapy from (Olevia(®)) to an equivalent omega-3 formulation (Esapent(®)), we documented a decrease in her plasma triglycerides levels. In order to evaluate a possible difference between these formulations we performed a single blind in vitro dissolution test using three pills for each formulation of omega-3 (Olevia(®), Esapent® and another one chosen between the several formulations available in commerce: DOC Generic(®)) that revealed a significant difference (>20%) in the dissolution time of three different omega- 3 commercially available drug formulation.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Docosahexaenoic Acids / metabolism
  • Docosahexaenoic Acids / pharmacology
  • Drug Compounding
  • Drug Substitution / methods*
  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid / metabolism
  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid / pharmacology
  • Fatty Acids, Omega-3 / metabolism
  • Fatty Acids, Omega-3 / pharmacology*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Triglycerides / antagonists & inhibitors*
  • Triglycerides / blood

Substances

  • Esapent
  • Fatty Acids, Omega-3
  • Triglycerides
  • Docosahexaenoic Acids
  • Eicosapentaenoic Acid