Butterfly Eyespots: Their Potential Influence on Aesthetic Preferences and Conservation Attitudes

PLoS One. 2015 Nov 6;10(11):e0141433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141433. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

Research has shown that the mere presence of stimuli that resemble eyes is sufficient to attract attention, elicit aesthetic responses, and can even enhance prosocial behavior. However, it is less clear whether eye-like stimuli could also be used as a tool for nature conservation. Several animal species, including butterflies, develop eye-like markings that are known as eyespots. In the present research, we explored whether the mere display of eyespots on butterfly wings can enhance: (a) liking for a butterfly species, and (b) attitudes and behaviors towards conservation of a butterfly species. Four online experimental studies, involving 613 participants, demonstrated that eyespots significantly increased liking for a butterfly species. Furthermore, eyespots significantly increased positive attitudes towards conservation of a butterfly species (Studies 1, 2 and 4), whereas liking mediated the eyespot effect on conservation attitudes (Study 2). However, we also found some mixed evidence for an association between eyespots and actual conservation behavior (Studies 3 and 4). Overall, these findings suggest that eyespots may increase liking for an animal and sensitize humans to conservation. We discuss possible implications for biodiversity conservation and future research directions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Animals
  • Attitude*
  • Behavior
  • Butterflies / anatomy & histology*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources*
  • Esthetics*
  • Eye*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Young Adult

Grants and funding

Support was provided by: 1) John Templeton Grant, Grant ID: 43919 [http://www.templeton.org/what-we-fund/grants/altruism-eye-cues-and-social-value-orientation-under-what-conditions-does-a-sens]. Authors who received the funding: PAMVL TVP ZM]; 2) The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Veni, Grant ID: 451.10.032) [http://www.nwo.nl/en/research-and-results/research-projects/08/2300161108.html]. Author who received the funding: TVP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.